<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Business Process Analytics Format (BPAF)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bpm-research.com/2009/02/22/the-business-process-analytics-format-bpaf/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bpm-research.com/2009/02/22/the-business-process-analytics-format-bpaf/</link>
	<description>Standards, Research &#38; Innovation around Business Process Management and Workflow</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 19:03:18 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Elias Krzynowek</title>
		<link>http://www.bpm-research.com/2009/02/22/the-business-process-analytics-format-bpaf/comment-page-1/#comment-2712</link>
		<dc:creator>Elias Krzynowek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 05:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bpm-research.com/?p=55#comment-2712</guid>
		<description>I will be away on business can they deliver to a P.O.  Box?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will be away on business can they deliver to a P.O.  Box?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Standardizing event logs &#8212; Flux Capacitor</title>
		<link>http://www.bpm-research.com/2009/02/22/the-business-process-analytics-format-bpaf/comment-page-1/#comment-1113</link>
		<dc:creator>Standardizing event logs &#8212; Flux Capacitor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 00:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bpm-research.com/?p=55#comment-1113</guid>
		<description>[...] the standardization process of the new Business Process Analytics Format (BPAF) for quite a while. Read his post to see what the new format will look like, and to join the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the standardization process of the new Business Process Analytics Format (BPAF) for quite a while. Read his post to see what the new format will look like, and to join the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Far Flung Analytics - BPAF &#171; Go Flow</title>
		<link>http://www.bpm-research.com/2009/02/22/the-business-process-analytics-format-bpaf/comment-page-1/#comment-630</link>
		<dc:creator>Far Flung Analytics - BPAF &#171; Go Flow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 04:10:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bpm-research.com/?p=55#comment-630</guid>
		<description>[...] 23, 2009 Filed under: Uncategorized &#124;   Michael zur Muehlen has written a short article on &#8220;The Business Process Analytics Format (BPAF)&#8220;. This is a portable format that will allow the history events from multiple BPM servers to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 23, 2009 Filed under: Uncategorized |   Michael zur Muehlen has written a short article on &#8220;The Business Process Analytics Format (BPAF)&#8220;. This is a portable format that will allow the history events from multiple BPM servers to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael zur Muehlen</title>
		<link>http://www.bpm-research.com/2009/02/22/the-business-process-analytics-format-bpaf/comment-page-1/#comment-629</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael zur Muehlen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 20:26:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bpm-research.com/?p=55#comment-629</guid>
		<description>Chris, thank you very much for the suggestion - that is exactly the kind of feedback we were hoping for. I will look at this change and post an updated version later today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris, thank you very much for the suggestion &#8211; that is exactly the kind of feedback we were hoping for. I will look at this change and post an updated version later today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Process for the Enterprise &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Business Process Visualization</title>
		<link>http://www.bpm-research.com/2009/02/22/the-business-process-analytics-format-bpaf/comment-page-1/#comment-628</link>
		<dc:creator>Process for the Enterprise &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Business Process Visualization</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 20:10:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bpm-research.com/?p=55#comment-628</guid>
		<description>[...] brings me to an article on The Business Process Analytics Format (BPAF).  Good read, and a good reminder that there are folks out there trying to put standardized [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] brings me to an article on The Business Process Analytics Format (BPAF).  Good read, and a good reminder that there are folks out there trying to put standardized [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Han</title>
		<link>http://www.bpm-research.com/2009/02/22/the-business-process-analytics-format-bpaf/comment-page-1/#comment-627</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Han</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 18:05:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bpm-research.com/?p=55#comment-627</guid>
		<description>Great! Just one thing: I think it&#039;s better to move bpaf:DataElement node under an additional node called bpaf:DataElements - an explicit collection-type node. This way, we will be able to map this schema to a object model elegantly. You can easily model a class hierarchy representing that an Event class has a collection-type memeber called DataElements which consists of DataElement-type items. You can&#039;t directly model an Event class that has an ambiguous number of DataElement described by maxOccurs=&quot;unbounded&quot; attribute. I believe this will ease the adoption of this standard in practice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great! Just one thing: I think it&#8217;s better to move bpaf:DataElement node under an additional node called bpaf:DataElements &#8211; an explicit collection-type node. This way, we will be able to map this schema to a object model elegantly. You can easily model a class hierarchy representing that an Event class has a collection-type memeber called DataElements which consists of DataElement-type items. You can&#8217;t directly model an Event class that has an ambiguous number of DataElement described by maxOccurs=&#8221;unbounded&#8221; attribute. I believe this will ease the adoption of this standard in practice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
